Archive |

Wednesday, 15 January, 2025

Editorial

Revisiting BDR Carnage — Justice and Accountability Needed

  09 Jan 2025, 16:09

The gruesome tragedy that unfolded at the Bangladesh Rifles (BDR) headquarters in Pilkhana on February 25-26, 2009, remains one of the darkest chapters in Bangladesh’s history. The mutiny, which led to the brutal killing of 57 army officers and other personnel, left an indelible scar on the nation’s collective psyche. In the aftermath of the carnage, many questions about accountability, justice, and the root causes of the mutiny have lingered. The events this week, including a procession by BDR family members and anti-discrimination student activists, have once again brought these unresolved issues to the forefront.

On Wednesday, family members of the deceased BDR personnel and members of an anti-discrimination student movement organized a procession from the Central Shaheed Minar to the State Guest House Jamuna, the office of Chief Adviser Dr. Muhammad Yunus. Their demand was straightforward yet profound: the release of soldiers who had been wrongfully implicated in the mutiny. The procession, however, was stopped by police near Shahbagh, underscoring the continuing tension surrounding this tragedy. The procession, despite being curtailed by the police, reflects the resilience of civil society in demanding accountability. The inclusion of anti-discrimination student activists in the march signals that the quest for justice is not limited to the affected families but is a national concern. Students have historically played a pivotal role in Bangladesh’s movements for justice and freedom, from the Language Movement of 1952 to the Liberation War of 1971. Their involvement in this cause adds moral weight and urgency.

However, the suppression of peaceful protests, as witnessed at Shahbagh, is concerning. Democratic societies must allow space for dissent and dialogue. Silencing such voices only deepens public mistrust and perpetuates the culture of impunity. The cries for justice by the families of the innocent soldiers who have been entangled in this horrific event cannot be ignored. Many of the accused were subjected to mass trials under the Speedy Trial Tribunal and other courts, raising significant questions about the fairness and transparency of these proceedings. Allegations of forced confessions, torture, and the lack of proper legal representation have cast a shadow over the judicial process. As a nation that prides itself on its commitment to justice and human rights, these claims warrant serious investigation and redress.

It is also important to highlight that justice must be holistic. It is not only about punishing the guilty but also about ensuring that the innocent are exonerated. Without a thorough and unbiased re-evaluation of the trials, the spectre of injustice will continue to haunt the country, eroding public confidence in the judicial system. The formation of an independent commission to investigate the mutiny was a step in the right direction. Major General (retd) ALM Fazlur Rahman, the head of this commission, recently remarked that the army’s inaction during the mutiny was reminiscent of the betrayal at Plassey. He suggested that local and foreign conspirators might have orchestrated the events at Pilkhana. These claims, while grave, highlight the complexity of the mutiny and the multiple layers of intrigue surrounding it.

The BDR carnage was not an isolated incident but a reflection of systemic issues within the country’s security apparatus and governance. The grievances of the rank-and-file soldiers, which allegedly fueled the mutiny, point to the need for reform within paramilitary and military institutions. Addressing issues such as pay disparity, promotion policies, and working conditions is essential to prevent future unrest. Additionally, the tragedy highlights the importance of building robust mechanisms for conflict resolution within institutions. If the grievances of the soldiers had been addressed through proper channels, the Pilkhana massacre might have been averted.

The BDR carnage was a national tragedy that shook the very foundation of Bangladesh’s security and governance. As the country moves forward, it must not allow the shadows of this event to obscure its commitment to justice, accountability, and human rights. The voices of the families of the victims and the wrongfully accused must be heard, and their demands must be met with sincerity and action. This week’s procession, though halted, is a reminder that the quest for justice is far from over. As a nation, Bangladesh owes it to the memory of those who perished, to the wrongfully accused, and to future generations to ensure that the lessons of Pilkhana are never forgotten and that such a tragedy is never repeated.

Comments

Rebuilding BB's Capacity and Credibility Crucial for Sustainable Growth
The Verdict of History: The Showdown Between Hasina and Khaleda
Respect in Action / Can Dr. Yunus’s Gesture Redefine Bangladesh’s Polarised Politics?
The Battle Against Polythene Bags
News Analysis / Zia Charitable Trust Graft Case: A Stark Example of Judicial Politicisation
Editorial

Revisiting BDR Carnage — Justice and Accountability Needed

  09 Jan 2025, 16:09

The gruesome tragedy that unfolded at the Bangladesh Rifles (BDR) headquarters in Pilkhana on February 25-26, 2009, remains one of the darkest chapters in Bangladesh’s history. The mutiny, which led to the brutal killing of 57 army officers and other personnel, left an indelible scar on the nation’s collective psyche. In the aftermath of the carnage, many questions about accountability, justice, and the root causes of the mutiny have lingered. The events this week, including a procession by BDR family members and anti-discrimination student activists, have once again brought these unresolved issues to the forefront.

On Wednesday, family members of the deceased BDR personnel and members of an anti-discrimination student movement organized a procession from the Central Shaheed Minar to the State Guest House Jamuna, the office of Chief Adviser Dr. Muhammad Yunus. Their demand was straightforward yet profound: the release of soldiers who had been wrongfully implicated in the mutiny. The procession, however, was stopped by police near Shahbagh, underscoring the continuing tension surrounding this tragedy. The procession, despite being curtailed by the police, reflects the resilience of civil society in demanding accountability. The inclusion of anti-discrimination student activists in the march signals that the quest for justice is not limited to the affected families but is a national concern. Students have historically played a pivotal role in Bangladesh’s movements for justice and freedom, from the Language Movement of 1952 to the Liberation War of 1971. Their involvement in this cause adds moral weight and urgency.

However, the suppression of peaceful protests, as witnessed at Shahbagh, is concerning. Democratic societies must allow space for dissent and dialogue. Silencing such voices only deepens public mistrust and perpetuates the culture of impunity. The cries for justice by the families of the innocent soldiers who have been entangled in this horrific event cannot be ignored. Many of the accused were subjected to mass trials under the Speedy Trial Tribunal and other courts, raising significant questions about the fairness and transparency of these proceedings. Allegations of forced confessions, torture, and the lack of proper legal representation have cast a shadow over the judicial process. As a nation that prides itself on its commitment to justice and human rights, these claims warrant serious investigation and redress.

It is also important to highlight that justice must be holistic. It is not only about punishing the guilty but also about ensuring that the innocent are exonerated. Without a thorough and unbiased re-evaluation of the trials, the spectre of injustice will continue to haunt the country, eroding public confidence in the judicial system. The formation of an independent commission to investigate the mutiny was a step in the right direction. Major General (retd) ALM Fazlur Rahman, the head of this commission, recently remarked that the army’s inaction during the mutiny was reminiscent of the betrayal at Plassey. He suggested that local and foreign conspirators might have orchestrated the events at Pilkhana. These claims, while grave, highlight the complexity of the mutiny and the multiple layers of intrigue surrounding it.

The BDR carnage was not an isolated incident but a reflection of systemic issues within the country’s security apparatus and governance. The grievances of the rank-and-file soldiers, which allegedly fueled the mutiny, point to the need for reform within paramilitary and military institutions. Addressing issues such as pay disparity, promotion policies, and working conditions is essential to prevent future unrest. Additionally, the tragedy highlights the importance of building robust mechanisms for conflict resolution within institutions. If the grievances of the soldiers had been addressed through proper channels, the Pilkhana massacre might have been averted.

The BDR carnage was a national tragedy that shook the very foundation of Bangladesh’s security and governance. As the country moves forward, it must not allow the shadows of this event to obscure its commitment to justice, accountability, and human rights. The voices of the families of the victims and the wrongfully accused must be heard, and their demands must be met with sincerity and action. This week’s procession, though halted, is a reminder that the quest for justice is far from over. As a nation, Bangladesh owes it to the memory of those who perished, to the wrongfully accused, and to future generations to ensure that the lessons of Pilkhana are never forgotten and that such a tragedy is never repeated.

Comments

Rebuilding BB's Capacity and Credibility Crucial for Sustainable Growth
The Verdict of History: The Showdown Between Hasina and Khaleda
Respect in Action / Can Dr. Yunus’s Gesture Redefine Bangladesh’s Polarised Politics?
The Battle Against Polythene Bags
News Analysis / Zia Charitable Trust Graft Case: A Stark Example of Judicial Politicisation