Freedom of the press is an essential cornerstone of any democratic society, and its role in building a better, more transparent nation cannot be overstated. In Bangladesh, press freedom has often found itself in a precarious position, especially during the years of Sheikh Hasina’s government, when the media operated under significant constraints. Laws such as the Digital Security Act (DSA) and the Cyber Security Act have been used to silence dissenting voices and restrict critical journalism. In such a climate, the media’s role as a watchdog and voice of the people has been severely diminished.

Dr. Muhammad Yunus' remarks on the government’s intention to form a media commission mark a crucial moment in the country’s political and social landscape. As the Chief Advisor has noted, the formation of such a commission could ensure that the press can operate without fear or undue restrictions. If the media is to fulfill its role in a democracy, it must be allowed to function freely and without hindrance, holding those in power accountable for their actions. This proposed media commission could play a pivotal role in this regard, especially if it is formed with genuine intent to empower journalists, safeguard press freedom, and protect freedom of expression.

Dr. Yunus’ speech highlighted the government’s acknowledgement that freedom of the press and expression has already been guaranteed, with officials even encouraging open criticism of the government. While this statement sounds encouraging, the reality has often been different. During Sheikh Hasina’s era, the media frequently faced pressures from both legal and extralegal mechanisms. Journalists were arrested, intimidated, and even physically harmed for reporting on sensitive issues. The most infamous of these restrictions was the Digital Security Act (DSA), which, under the guise of protecting national security and combating fake news, became a tool for silencing dissent. Thousands of journalists, activists, and ordinary citizens were subjected to harassment, false cases, and imprisonment under this law, creating a chilling effect that stifled the free exchange of ideas.

One of the most hopeful signs in Dr. Yunus’ address was his recognition of the urgent need to amend or repeal draconian laws like the DSA. According to him, the government has already compiled a list of such laws, with the aim of repealing or amending them where necessary. This is a promising step forward. If successfully implemented, the removal of these 'black laws' would lift a heavy burden from the shoulders of the media and allow journalists to once again fulfill their role as a check on power. The assurance to withdraw false and harassing cases filed under the DSA is also a welcome sign, especially for those who have been unjustly targeted for their work.

However, it is critical to remember that these legal reforms must be accompanied by broader cultural changes within the government and society at large. Simply removing repressive laws will not be enough to restore press freedom fully. The government must ensure that institutions responsible for enforcing the law and protecting citizens’ rights are transparent, accountable, and free from political interference. The independence of the judiciary, law enforcement agencies, and other regulatory bodies will be vital in creating a safe environment for journalists to operate in.

Dr. Yunus also made it clear that the government is not just focused on ensuring press freedom but also on strengthening existing commissions to hold both the government and other powerful entities accountable. His commitment to reorganizing these commissions to work more effectively for the public good is a positive step. A strong, independent press can only function well in tandem with other institutions that support accountability, transparency, and justice. The media alone cannot be expected to carry the burden of ensuring good governance in Bangladesh. Reforming and empowering these commissions would provide the necessary institutional framework for the press to operate without undue pressure or influence.

Additionally, the interim government has pledged to prioritize the resolution of several high-profile cases, including the murders of journalist couple Sagar Sarowar and Meherun Nahar Runi, whose deaths remain unresolved 12 years later. These cases serve as grim reminders of the dangers faced by journalists in Bangladesh. Failure to deliver justice in these instances sends a message of impunity, making it even harder for the press to operate freely and without fear. The promise of swift investigations into these cases is encouraging, but action must follow words. Resolving these cases would send a clear message that attacks on journalists will not be tolerated and that the state is committed to protecting the rights and lives of those who speak truth to power.

In Sheikh Hasina’s era, the relationship between the government and the media was often strained, with the press finding itself in a dictated role. Many media outlets became mouthpieces of the ruling party, either willingly or out of fear of repercussions. This created an environment where critical issues—such as corruption, human rights abuses, and political mismanagement—were often downplayed or ignored. The press, instead of holding power accountable, became an instrument of power, to the detriment of democracy and public trust. Rebuilding this trust will require time, but the establishment of a media commission, along with the repeal of oppressive laws and the strengthening of institutions, can lay the foundation for a healthier relationship between the press and the state.

A free press is not only vital for holding governments accountable but also for informing and empowering citizens. In a country like Bangladesh, where economic disparity, poverty, and social injustice remain significant challenges, the media plays a critical role in highlighting these issues and advocating for change. Press freedom is essential for ensuring that marginalized voices are heard and that policies meant to serve the public good are implemented transparently and effectively. The media must be free to scrutinize, investigate, and report without fear of retribution, as this is the only way to ensure that those in power are working for the welfare of the people.

Dr. Yunus’ vision for a media commission that allows the press to operate freely is a vision for a better Bangladesh—one where transparency, accountability, and justice are not just ideals, but realities. However, this vision will only be realized if the government follows through on its promises, not only by establishing the commission but by fostering a culture of openness and respect for dissent. As Bangladesh moves forward, the role of the press will be more critical than ever in shaping a nation that is not only economically prosperous but also just and free.

The road to press freedom in Bangladesh is long and challenging, but with the right reforms and genuine commitment to change, it is achievable. A truly free press will empower citizens, hold the government to account, and contribute to building a stronger, more equitable nation. This is the vision that Dr. Yunus has outlined, and it is a vision that all who believe in democracy and freedom must support.